I read that medical information should be shared if it is anonymous. I used to agree with that. Why would I not agree if everything is above-board, if the information was being shared to improve the health care of people and if things were done morally and ethically. But then I found out how the medical system really works.
These posts have examples of how, essentially, all our information has been shared non-anonymously:
-Post – Auditor General – PARIS report – 5/24/2010 – Vancouver Coastal Health audit showed that there was virtually no protection of patient information. And there was no reason to believe that any other hospital database was any better.
- Post – Our Information is not protected – Part I – 12/27/2015 – researchers could, and were, downloading and sharing our information with no detection. They could give it to anyone else, who could also “share” this information, again without detection.
– Post – Our Information is not protected – Part II – 12/29/2015 – more examples of how our information is shared non-anonymously
Post – Patenting DNA – 2016-02-04 – if you collect enough information on an individual, even if it is anonymous, you can identify who they are.
And we know, logically, that this is just the tip of the iceberg. The ones the media happen to find out about. The rest are either not caught or they are covered up.
Now, I would only agree to my information being shared conditionally. The conditions being:
- I am told if information is being collected for “others” and not for my direct personal health care
- I am told who it is being shared with.
- I am told how it will be used.
- I have proof that the information collected under my name is being adequately protected.
- It can be proven to me that this information will only be shared anonymously.
- I can get this in writing.
- There will be severe penalties if any of the conditions listed above are “violated”.
This, of course, presumes that I have any say in the collection and sharing of my information, which in our low-grade so-called democracy; I don’t. The medical system and their friends do what they want. I am, like other patients except the “special” patients, just fodder for them to feed off.
But any information that I determine they don’t need for my direct health care (and that is very little) I mix up between truth/lies. The information then becomes useless.
These people in the medical/government business just steal, lie and con. Why? They eventually lose all trust and it just comes back on them. What are they getting in return for taking such risks? Or did they really think they could do this forever with impunity? Are they that arrogant/narcissistic? Apparently, they are.