What the SNC-Lavalin scandal revealed was Jody Wilson-Raybould and other heroes but it also clearly exposed how the government works, who works for whom and the non-existent accountability of politicians, at least in a majority government.
I see a light of ethics, morals, and integrity flicker in politics. Thank you to Jody Wilson-Raybould (JWR), Dr. Jane Philpott, Kathleen Roussel (director of public prosecutions), and Louis De Jaeger (p) for working for the people. There are other heroes I have written about on past posts, John Doyle, former auditor general of British Columbia, and Alana James, a lawyer who formerly was a British Columbia Senior health information advisor and whistleblower (see posts re B.C. Health Ministry Scandal), Mary-Ellen Turpel, former B.C. Representative for Children and Youth, and a former judge (see posts re The Children), Edward Snowden and other whistleblowers .
I did not think it would be possible to have decent human beings, who actually represent us, the regular people, in politics. I thought the whole system would have to be torn down and rebuilt and it still may have to be. But these people have shown that ethics, morals, and integrity can happen if only for a brief moment. They are leading the way; if enough others would follow we could have a government system that is truly democratic, one the people could trust and respect, not the farce that we currently have.
It speaks to who the politicians are, and who they serve, that they would regurgitate this loss of 9,000 jobs when there appears to be no substance to it.
– Gerald Butts (former principal secretary to the PM) and Carla Qualtrough (Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Accessibility) could not name a source for the 9,000 jobs (n). How could Butts or Qualtrough not know who gave them the information? Did they just get together and make up a number? Would the source have been embarrassing? Did they just LIE because they have such contempt for the people? They just used this number as a reason for issuing a DPA and kept stating it to the press. Seriously disgusting.
– SNL-Lavalin stated that they never claimed that 9,000 jobs would be lost (s) and then backtracked (t) presumably after they got a call from the PMO’s office.
– SNC-Lavalin has current jobs to last several years (g) and skilled engineers are in high demand, (c)
– The ban would only be on federal projects, not provincial or municipal projects (g)
– The government contracts will be awarded to other companies who will hire employees.
– Jules Bourgeois – ‘province is dealing with an acute labour shortage…; in a situation of full employment….everyone’s looking for good employees (b)
– Around 2012 approximately 10,000 employees have left the company, many voluntarily. (g)(m) Apparently, most or all got other jobs.
So, why are the politicians lying/blackmailing Canadians, AGAIN?
- Trudeau is buddies with SNC-Lavalin management and didn’t want to see them go to court even when they didn’t qualify for a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA).
- Trudeau wanted a made-up crisis so he could fake being the saviour and get Quebec votes in the next provincial and federal elections. “He also acknowledged that during his Sept. 17 meeting with Wilson-Raybould, he pointed out that he was the MP for Papineau, a riding in Quebec — where SNC-Lavalin is based — but denied he was pressuring her for partisan interests.” (i)
- SNC-Lavalin is still handing out bribes
- All of the above
But any way you look at it, the partisan reasons are, I understand, illegal in obtaining a DPA. Martyn Brown said ‘“But if the public interest argument is based on a lie, and they knew that, then all that you’re left with is a political motive, an electoral motive that would be self-serving. And that to me would raise questions of obstruction of justice, breach of trust, all sorts of things that the RCMP would suddenly be concerned with.”’ (u)
Jody Wilson-Raybould and Kathleen Roussel were doing their jobs, serving the people of Canada (and trying to protect the Prime Minister from his own follies), which is what they were hired to do. Jane Philpott was doing the same by standing up, and being counted, in the defense of the people of Canada and what’s left of our democracy, our freedom, our rights.
The other politicians in the Liberal party kept repeating that she had to be loyal to the party, they had to serve the leader of the party and the handful of others, most not elected, who run the party/country (w, x); this is also called Groupthink. (see future post Politicians, bootlickers and groupthink) They didn’t care about the people of Canada, just the party which includes themselves. If a politician asks for my vote so he/she can represent me I will call them what they are – LIARS; they represent the party, not me. And maybe I will tell them and their families to go drink mercury (see future post Politicians, bootlickers and groupthink)
And the people of Canada cannot hold the politicians accountable. The justice committee and ethics committee are both Liberal dominated so they “reviewed” in a manner beneficial to the Liberal party. Andrew Coyne said “In our system, the prime minister decides whether the prime minister should be held to account. Virtually all of the mechanisms by which he might theoretically be required to answer to credible charges of serious wrongdoing — and meddling with a prosecution is about as serious as it gets — are under his control. That certainly includes the committee, whatever pretense of independence might be maintained”; and (o) “Got a complaint, likewise, about the government’s obvious lack of enthusiasm for investigating itself? Great: take it up with the government.” (o) The results will be same as the ‘do nothing’ office of the privacy commissioner.
The politicians have people who will write op-eds without identifying that op-ed is being written on behalf of a political party, as stated by Katie Telford Ms. Telford, chief of staff to the prime minister, also offered to line up “all kinds of people to write op-eds saying that what (Ms. Wilson-Raybould) is doing is proper”; in other words they will say whatever the politicians want them to say. Isn’t this propaganda/brainwashing/indoctrination/newspeak? Is Susan Delacourt one of them? (v) And I suspect all political parties do this. People judge what they read, at least partly, based on the source of the article. The people have a right to know if, for all intents and purposes, the source of the article is the prime minister’s office, at least in a real democracy.
And yet, Philippe Lagasse claims “We know our system is working when the safeguards we’ve put in place to address government chicanery kick in and do their job”. (y) What safeguards, a ruling party-controlled committees fake “investigations”? Two people who had to quit the party because one of them dared to speak the truth? It’s a healthy democracy when two people can have a difference of “opinion” without one losing their job. Gerald Butts and Michael Wernick, while culpable, were the fall guys so the Prime Minister was protected, the party was protected and nothing had to change.
He also states “But our constitution has mechanisms to hold governments to account”. (y) Perhaps he could explain those mechanisms, and how they are operating in this case because I don’t see them happening here, quite the opposite. What the SNC-Lavalin scandal demonstrates is that we not only do NOT have “a healthy democratic immune system at work” but that, we don’t have much, if any, of a democracy.
Are the other political parties any different? Not that I can see. In fact, they don’t even have one, much less two, politicians that work for the people of Canada.
If I was in the riding of JWR or Dr. Philpott I would vote for them. But since I’m not I will not be voting for someone who does not represent me; I will not willingly be their sucker. (q)
The system we have doesn’t work for the regular people of Canada. JWR wants to change the party system: “Wilson-Raybould believes that the party system as it now exists has to be re-invented. It is not parties per se that are the problem, but the way in which they have evolved. They are too leader-centric, and far too partisan. In her view, both the PM and other party leaders have to be responsive to parliament, not the other way around.
‘I don’t believe in blind loyalty or blind partisanship. I do not believe in making decisions that set aside important public policy for the sake of political power. I do not believe that the best public policy is just getting re-elected. I believe in doing good public policy, regardless of what party is in power.”’ (z) I hope she, and Jane Philpott, get the opportunity to change the party system and, if we’re lucky, it might work.
It would also be interesting to see what would happen if independents held the balance of power or formed a minority government. Would the people of Canada actually be represented and would we get good public policy?
a. A closer look at SNC-Lavalin’s somewhat murky past– Kathleen Blaze Baum, Tavia Grant and Wendy Stueck, 08 Feb 2019, CBC News
b. Why many Quebecers want SNC-Lavalin to Stand Trial – Simone Nakonechny, 09 Mar 2016, CBC News
c. Four questions without answers about the SNC-Lavalin scandal – David Thurton, 12 Mar 2019, CBC News
d. Liberal MP Who Led Committee Shutdown Denies Coverup, Says It’s Time For ‘Shift’ in SNC-Lavalin Debate – Kathleen Harris, 14 Mar 2019, CBC News
e. Butts Sinks Trudeau Government Deeper into the Muck – Michael Harris, 08 Mar 2019, TheTyee.ca
f. A closer look at SNC-Lavalin’s somewhat murky past – Kathryn Blaze Baum, Tavia Grant and Wendy Stueck, 08 Feb 2019, CBC News
g. An economic reality check on SNC-Lavalin: Are 9,000 jobs really at stake? – Diana Swain, 08 Mar 2019, CBC News
h. Here’s what a 10-year ban on federal contract bids would mean for SNC-Lavalin – The Canadian Press, 17 Mar 2019, CBC News
i. What you need to know about the SNC-Lavalin affair – Mark Gollom, 13 Feb 2019, CBC News
j. Budget documents show widespread use of ‘consultancy cost’ code – Dave Seglins, 15 May 2013, CBC News
k. Wilson-Raybould’s SNC-Lavalin claims set ‘all alarms sounding’ at OECD: spokesman – Joran Gowling, Vassy Kapelos, 13 Mar 2019, CBC News
l. World Bank Debars SNC-Lavalin Inc. And it’s Affiliates for 10 years – The World Bank, 17 Apr 2013
m. SNC-Lavalin Affair –Wikipedia
n. Trudeau’s No Good, Very Bad Week – David Beers, 14 Mar 2019, TheTyee.ca
o. Andrew Coyne: Sooner or later the truth comes out. But in our system, not so much – Andrew Coyne, 13 Mar 2019, National Post
p. B.C. Riding association leader quits after Trudeau ousts ex-ministers from caucus – Jessica Peters, 03 Apr 2019, Cloverdale Reporter
q. Why I Don’t Vote – Update – http://Hospitalsandprivacyandpolitics.noblogs.org
r. A Closer Look: The 11 People Wilson-Raybould Said Were Involved in the SNC-Lavalin Affair – Kathryn Blaze Baum, Tavia Grant and Wendy Stueck, 01 Mar 2019, Globe and Mail
s. SNC-Lavalin CEO says firm never cited 9,000 jobs as reason for deserving DPA – Canadian Press, 20 Mar 2019, CBC News
t. SNC-Lavalin backtracks on CEO’s comments surrounding potential job losses – Canadian Press, 25 Mar 2019, National Newswatch
u. Trudeau a Threat to Liberal Chances, Must Go: Martyn Brown – David Beers, 25 Mar 2019, TheTyee.ca
v. SNC-Lavalin affair: Philpott and Wilson-Raybould aren’t lifelong Liberals, and some say that’s the problem – CBC Radio transcript, 05 Mar 2019
w. Trudeau defends actions as Philpott asks if Wilson-Raybould was sidelined over SNC-Lavalin – Kathleen Harris, 21 Mar 2019, CBC News
x. Jody Wilson-Raybould: ‘The Liberal party is not something I understand anymore’ – John Geddes, 04 Apr 2019, Maclean’s
y. The SNC-Lavalin scandal is proof our system of government is working. Seriously – Philippe Lagasse, 05 Mar 2019, Maclean’s
z. Jody Wilson-Raybould on Her Path to Independence – Michael Harris, 10 Jun 2019, TheTyee.ca